If you're confused about what kind of milk to drink, what type of cooking oil is "healthiest" or whether the Mediterranean diet is the ticket to heart health, you're not alone. Nutrition experts dig into the complexity of dietary research.
Digesting dietary advice
The constant churn of nutrition news, books and blog posts — combined with the growing number of food options at the grocery store — can feel contradictory and make your head spin when it comes to making healthy diet decisions.
"As a dietitian, even I get tripped up when new studies that come out that question my beliefs," Washington Post writer Cara Rosenbloom admits in a recent article on "how to handle ever-changing nutrition science." She interviewed Dariush Mozzafarian, the cardiologist and researcher behind this 2018 BMJ analysis of nutrition science.
They make the case that we have an issue with how we "digest" food advice:
Share this post on Twitter and help spread the word.

- We take it very personally. "If you learn in physics that there was new research about a black hole, you may say, 'Oh, that's interesting,' but you don't change your habits because the science has changed," Mozaffarian says. But people these days tend to swiftly avoid or adopt foods (such as wheat/gluten or coconut oil) based on new information or faddish magazine reports that may not warrant dietary changes.
- We cling to every new study. New nutrition research comes out weekly but people (and policymakers) would be wise not to focus on single studies, Mozaffarian argues. Understanding the relationship between foods, wellness and disease takes a long time.
- We don't have centralized government guidelines. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are just a few sources of government recommendations on nutrition. Mozaffarian says a cabinet-level position that centralizes or coordinates nutrition guidelines would help eliminate confusion.
